On Thu 08 Oct 2015 at 17:59:22 +0000, Stephan wrote: > IMHO it would be valid to pass the value of sp as the first argument > (mov r0, sp). However, the way how r0 is computed looks quite > obfuscated to me: > > 0x4621402c <g_dpgettext2+72>: mov r3, sp => ? > 0x46214030 <g_dpgettext2+76>: lsr r7, r3, #3 => ? > 0x46214034 <g_dpgettext2+80>: lsl r4, r7, #3 => ? ... > 0x46214040 <g_dpgettext2+92>: mov r0, r4 => ? I don't really know any ARM assembly but it seems that the value from sp is shifted right 3 bits and then left again. In effect clearing the low 3 bits, or aligning to 8. Which by itself is a very sensible thing to do for an allocator. Unfortunately (since it rounds down) it can have the effect of allocating the memory lower than sp, which is bound to fail at some point. Probably the value should also go back into sp. There is also an alloca in libc: cvs/src/lib/libc/arch/arm/gen/alloca.S. It uses a similar shifting trick but it uses it to round up the allocation size to multiples of 8, and it does end up with the same value in r0 and sp. -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The Doctor: No, 'eureka' is Greek for \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- 'this bath is too hot.'
Description: PGP signature