Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: cgd breakage
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:16:48PM +0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost (Patrick Welche) writes:
>
> >I've been running a Sun Aug 9 2015 7.99.20/amd64 kernel with /home on
> >cgd. I just rebooted with one built just now with up to date source, and
> >fsck complains:
>
> >** /dev/rcgd0a
> >BAD SUPER BLOCK: CAN'T FIND SUPERBLOCK
>
>
> Any more details about it? In particular about underlying disk
> geometry?
$ disklabel -t raid4
raid7|Automatically generated label:\
:dt=RAID:se#512:ns#128:nt#8:sc#1024:nc#204800:\
:pa#209715136:oa#64:ta=cgd:\
:pc#209715200:oc#0:\
:pd#209715200:od#0:
$ disklabel -t cgd0
cgd2|Automatically generated label:\
:dt=cgd:se#512:ns#2048:nt#1:sc#2048:nc#102400:\
:pa#209715136:oa#0:ta=4.2BSD:ba#0:fa#0:\
:pc#209715136:oc#0:\
:pd#209715136:od#0:
(They were renamed at some point in the past.)
# dumpfs cgd0 | more
file system: /dev/rcgd0d
format FFSv2
endian little-endian
location 65536 (-b 128)
magic 19540119 time Tue Aug 18 23:28:29 2015
superblock location 65536 id [ 52aaca14 332f69d1 ]
cylgrp dynamic inodes FFSv2 sblock FFSv2 fslevel 5
nbfree 3656735 ndir 22073 nifree 12533902 nffree 9735
ncg 554 size 52428784 blocks 50828787
bsize 16384 shift 14 mask 0xffffc000
fsize 2048 shift 11 mask 0xfffff800
frag 8 shift 3 fsbtodb 2
bpg 11830 fpg 94640 ipg 22976
...
Are those the right sort of details?
Cheers,
Patrick
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index