[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Revisiting DTrace syscall provider
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 6:11pm, ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost (Ryota Ozaki) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: Revisiting DTrace syscall provider
> | I first did so but I changed back to systrace because FreeBSD named it
> | systrace and named modules for syscall emulations as systrace_linux32
> | and systrace_freebsd32. If we follow so, we should keep systrace name as is?
> Seeing how much confusion "systrace" is causing I renamed it again:
Yea, they're better than dtrace_systrace* :)
BTW please don't forget to rename its internal name.
> | NP, please do it :)
> I am making one more change to make things even simpler than what FreeBSD
> did and save more space.
Main Index |
Thread Index |