Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: libatf still broken



On Jul 12,  3:32pm, julio%meroh.net@localhost (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: libatf still broken

| I don't understand your fix.  The comment says that libatf-c++ needs
| libstdc++, which is obvious.  But where does the libm dependency come from?
|  Is it an indirect dependency through libstdc++?

Yes, perhaps I should delete the libm mention.

christos


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index