Re: gdb + sigtraps

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Apr 2,  1:50pm, prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost (Patrick Welche) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: gdb + sigtraps

| On run, they both receive a SIGTRAP
| After c, the amd64 gets another SIGRAP, but the i386 apparently runs
| "RXl+", but dig consumes over 80% of one the cpus.  DiG 9.9.0a1 is never
| printed. dig simply consumes cpu cycles. ctrl-C in an attempt to see
| what dig is doing just prints "^C". kill -HUP the dig process then
| shows (well, from the beginning on the i386):

Try it now...

christos