The change for ls(1) should be modified to use printf(3)(There are two man pages for printf, 1 for printf(3) and one for printf(1) - perhaps that's why you didn't find the %'<format>?)
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:23:38AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Christos Zoulas wrote:What's wrong with %'<format>?Nothing! :) IMHo, the commaize_number changes including those in ls(1) should be backed out.hmm... the printf man page I was looking at didn't have a mention of that. Why should the change to ls be backed out? Is there something wrong with displaying the sizes with commas? eric !DSPAM:4d7f7ddb2271935216786!
------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: | | Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com | | Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net | | Kernel Developer | | pgoyette at netbsd.org | -------------------------------------------------------------------------