Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 5.99.42/i386 crash (backtrace + core available)

On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:48:47PM +0100, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
 > Looks like we have
 >      vnode e15c2170, type nullfs with lower vnode df8295c8, type ffs
 > so here we lookup the lower vnode, need a new one and hit the upper (nullfs)
 > vnode.  Trying to lock it always has to lock the lower vnode.  This is the
 > background of ad's comment in vclean
 >      /* XXXAD should not lock vnode under layer */
 >      mutex_exit(&vp->v_interlock);
 > I have no idea how to solve this mess...

Yeah, I saw that when I was looking at revoke and had a feeling we
were about to be in for some fun :(

David A. Holland

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index