Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: NetBSD xen dom0 kernel panic

In article <>, Frank  
<> wrote:
>YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>> Good, I think that the that pools that are used in interrupt contexts,
>>> should be using pool_cache_<foo> not pool_<foo> like the signal does.
>>> Is that right? Can you try to make this change?
>>> christos
>> it's fine to use pool_foo in interrupt context, if the pool is set up
>> properly.  however, this particular pool is not expected to be used
>> in interrupt context.  it's possible to make packet filters interrupt-safe,
>> but imo it's better to fix bridge_ipf.
>> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>A temporary solution would be to disable BRIDGE_IPF ?

that will work.

>If any patches become available, let me know so I can test them.


Can you explain how to fix bridge_ipf? Processing the packets in a separate
thread does not really work - I think - because you need to say yes or no,


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index