Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: build.sh vs. environment and mk.conf



On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Alan Barrett wrote:
>     Would it be good or bad if the default mk.conf file
>     was ignored by build.sh, and if you had to specify "-V
>     MKCONF=/path/to/mk.conf" if your really wanted to use a mk.conf
>     file?

That variable name should be MAKECONF, not MKCONF.

--apb (Alan Barrett)


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index