Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?

To: current-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
From: "Aaron J. Grier" <agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:45:12 -0700

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:47:18AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> The real fix for the "writes metadata twice" issue is to support a
> journal on another partition.  With a real SSD (that is, one that's
> not built from flash memory with its insane write penalty) this would
> make the extra writes almost free.

prestoserve!

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | 
agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
  - From: Christopher Chen

References:
- WAPBL vs. lfs?
  - From: Geert Hendrickx
- Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon

Prev by Date: Re: Raidctl -u ought to turn off autoconfigure on the target raid set
Next by Date: Re: My disk has shrunk?
Previous by Thread: Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
Next by Thread: Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index