Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)

[Greg Oster <oster%cs.usask.ca@localhost>]

Paul Goyette writes:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> 
> > With journal behind the file system:
> >
> > wapbl version 0x1       location 1      flags 0x0
> > wapbl loc0 636640256    loc1 131072     loc1 512        loc2 0
> > flags   wapbl
> 
> Just as an aside, is there really supposed to be two fields named 
> 'loc1'?
> 
> :)

Nope :)  Fixed.

Later...

Greg Oster