Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Is setitimer broken under current?

To: current-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Is setitimer broken under current?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:49:18 +0200

On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:39:30PM -0600, Sverre Froyen wrote:
> Running the program under 3.1 or 4.0 produces the expected:
> 
> reset1 = 0 0
> reset2 = 0 0
> normal exit reached

Hm. Works with my 4.99.68 AMD64 kernel.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is setitimer broken under current?
  - From: Sverre Froyen

References:
- Is setitimer broken under current?
  - From: Sverre Froyen

Prev by Date: Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)
Next by Date: Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)
Previous by Thread: Is setitimer broken under current?
Next by Thread: Re: Is setitimer broken under current?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index