Re: ghostscript and jemalloc

[Mark Davies <mark%mcs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost>]

On Thursday 06 March 2008 08:18:00 Matthias Drochner wrote:
> The patch didn't fix the real issue (and wasn't correct anyway),
> but lead to the underlying problem: an integer overflow in
> pointer comparision.
> I've just committed a fix.

Thanks for finding that.  I've added your patch to the bug report at 
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689711 so hopefully it will 
make it into the next upstream version.

cheers
mark