Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory

To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>
Subject: Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
From: Patrick Welche <prlw1%newn.cam.ac.uk@localhost>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:34:52 +0000

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:14:48PM +0000, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> I'll try, but with no message and no dump that isn't easy...

Post the program? (Have serial console...)

Patrick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
  - From: Steven M. Bellovin

References:
- Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
  - From: Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
  - From: YAMAMOTO Takashi
- Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
  - From: Steven M. Bellovin

Prev by Date: Re: msk(4) require to sync status buffer
Next by Date: serious current install issues (./build.sh install=/ installs as rafal:staff vs. root:wheel)
Previous by Thread: Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
Next by Thread: Re: Locking processes against being killed when low on memory
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index