Adam Hamsik <haaaad@gmail.com> writes:

> On Feb,Sunday 3 2008, at 7:51 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 04:44:00PM +0100, Adam Ciarci?ski wrote:
>>> And, why don't we go straight to 4.2.3? :)
>>
>> GPLv3 and GCC 4.2 regressions.
>
> What problem do we have with GPLv3 ? Do we want to completely switch  
> to pcc ? or we will use 4.1.* forever ?

Why everyone talks about pcc? Why noone explores other alternatives?
For instance, Watcom compiler, LLVM or TenDRA?


-- 
CKOPO BECHA...
   CKOPO CE3OH...