On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:35:52PM -0800, Tom Spindler wrote:
> > > And, why don't we go straight to 4.2.3? :)
> > 
> > GPLv3 and GCC 4.2 regressions.
> 
> Could you please enumerate what the GPLv3 issues actually are?
> There was some talk about binutils' libbfd being GPLv3, which is noxious -
> but the last time I checked the gcc tree, none of {libgcc, crt?.o, et al}
> were GPLv3'ed.

It doesn't cover libgcc and crt*, but it is still present for the rest
of GCC. I would prefer we don't set a precedence, IMO.

Joerg