rafal@pobox.com wrote:

>     all ===> libpam
>     pam_ssh.c:(.text+0x938): multiple definition of `pam_sm_authenticate'
 :
> Any clues appreciated... haven't had a chance to dig into it yet.. it does
> look like the same sources built fine for sparc64, however.

This is because src/dist/openpam/include/security/openpam.h
assumes __PIC__ means shlib targets but it is not true on mips.
(that's the reason why we have both CSHLIBFLAGS and CPICFLAG)

The attached patch works for me, but I wonder if we should remove
the !defined(__PIC__) check completely or not.
---
Izumi Tsutsui


Index: dist/openpam/include/security/openpam.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/dist/openpam/include/security/openpam.h,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 openpam.h
--- dist/openpam/include/security/openpam.h	27 Jan 2008 01:22:58 -0000	1.9
+++ dist/openpam/include/security/openpam.h	30 Jan 2008 15:45:29 -0000
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
 #define DATA_SET(a, b) __link_set_add_data(a, b)
 #endif
 
-#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__PIC__) && !defined(NO_STATIC_MODULES)
+#if defined(__GNUC__) && (!defined(__PIC__) || defined(__mips__)) && !defined(NO_STATIC_MODULES)
 /* gcc, static linking */
 # include <sys/cdefs.h>
 # ifdef __FreeBSD__