Subject: Re: Problem with today's -current
To: Andrew Doran <ad@netbsd.org>
From: Paul Goyette <paul@whooppee.com>
List: current-users
Date: 01/24/2008 13:52:48
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Andrew Doran wrote:
>>> vrelel: missing VOP_CLOSE(): vnode @ 0xffff800048f80d80, flags
>>> (30<MPSAFE,LOCKSWORK>)
>>> tag VT_UFS(1), type VREG(1), usecount 1, writecount 0, holdcount 1
>>> freelisthd 0x0, mount 0xffff8000045cb000, data 0xffff800048f360f0
>>> tag VT_UFS, ino 811439, on dev 0, 0 flags 0x11, effnlink 1, nlink 1
>>> mode 0100444, owner 0, group 0, size 837 lock type vnlock: EXCL
>>> (count 1) by pid 451.1
>>>
>>
>> Ok, these are just spam and can be ignored. I fixed the assertion so if it
>> fires again should be catching real problems. Although, a missing VOP_CLOSE
>> is likely to be "mostly harmless" and doesn't mean the machine is going down
>> in flames.
>
> sys/kern/vfs_subr.c 1.321
Yup - seems to have gone away. Thanks for the quick response.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP DSS Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul@whooppee.com |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette@juniper.net |
----------------------------------------------------------------------