On Jan,Sunday 6 2008, at 12:11 PM, John Nemeth wrote:

> On May 29,  5:30am, David Laight wrote:
> } On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:41:49AM -0700, John R. Shannon wrote:
> } > Line 1124 has:
> } >
> } > memcpy(inqbuf->vendor, "ADAPTEC ACB-4000            ", 28);
> } >
> } > and line 1144 has:
> } >
> } > memcpy(inqbuf->vendor, "EMULEX  MT-02 QIC           ", 28);
IMO we should replace this with per-entry memcpy calls.
We can keep that vendor string in another struct

struct vendor{
char    vendor[8];
char    product[16];
char    revision[4];
};

and staticaly set it to "EMULEX  MT-02 QIC". I don't that there can be  
any performance issues with more memcpy calls.

Regards

Adam.