On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:46:58AM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> There will be several puffs/FUSE options for something like this,
> among the clustering category, but none that are readily packaged now.
> 
> The cluster fs I'm most interested in (glusterfs) isn't quite there
> yet, it needs more low-level fuse support in refuse (or to be ported
> to puffs).

fuse lowlevel compatibility is gradually percolating its way up my
list of things to do, and it's now fairly near the top. I have an
initial stab at things coded up, but it needs a whole lot more done
before it can be fleshed out. The development strategy being used
is the same as used for refuse - the paper presented at EuroBSDcon
is also at:

	ftp://ftp.NetBSD.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/agc/refuse.pdf

More as it happens...

Regards,
Alistair