Subject: ataraid(4) vs. raidframe(4) (was: Re: ICH SMBus driver (from
To: Jeff Rizzo <riz@tastylime.net>
From: Jonathan A. Kollasch <jakllsch@kollasch.net>
List: current-users
Date: 07/23/2007 13:23:55
--da4uJneut+ArUgXk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:11:27AM -0700, Jeff Rizzo wrote:
> Blair Sadewitz wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of ICH drivers, I was looking at FreeBSD's ataraid driver to
> > see if I could add support for Intel's "MatrixRAID" to ataraid(4)
>=20
> Yes, please. :)
>=20
So, how is ataraid(4) better (or worse) than raidframe(4)?
Jonathan Kollasch
--da4uJneut+ArUgXk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFGpPI6Ojx1ye3hmokRAqRTAJ0USyYWluItl83WDI/MHpcxwCSJpQCeOUPp
duI28odwdy5GmbOfNL6GbMg=
=lCBY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--da4uJneut+ArUgXk--