Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org> writes:

>> But the other aspect of our staying in -current was my (possiblly
>> incorrect) understanding that if we submitted new bits, such as the
>> USB device subsystem, they'd go in current and not a stable branch.
>
> They'd go first into -current.
>
>> Given that you now know that we intend to submit some large chunks of
>> functionality should we be working in -current?
>
> That would certainly be easier for us.
>

And, I think, for us as well.

Can this thread serve as us putting y'all on notice that we've still
go big changes we'd like to contribute, or should I wander over to
tech-kern and mention the list there?