thus Zafer Aydogan spake:
>> only that there is no "jffs" and "zfs" for NetBSD,
> not yet, but maybe in the future.
> jffs is a soc project this year. (http://netbsd-soc.sf.net)
> zfs hopefully will be ported sometime.
> lfs is improving.
> 
> Z.
> 
>> "ffs" is rather
>> clearly showing its age and "lfs" despite huge improvements in the past
>> months is still not stable enough for production use.  now that's
>> _really_ great, something to be proud of..

sure, but wishful thinking doesn't help setting up state-of-the-art 
servers ;)

timo