On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:07:22 +0000 (UTC), christos@astron.com (Christos
Zoulas) wrote:
> 
> Does it do better with i8254?
> 
I haven't run it that way for nearly as long, but the answer seems to be yes,
it does better:

$ ntpq -c peer
     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
+csss.cs.sfu.ca  142.58.103.1     3 u    2   64  377   82.892   33.884  25.477
+24-231-211-108. 130.126.24.53    3 u   17   64  277   66.083   39.354  24.542
*216.106.191.180 192.5.41.41      2 u   12   64  377   45.019   71.339  30.773
+kamaji.efball.c 69.25.96.12      2 u   15   64  277   95.218   50.402  20.514

(I restarted ntpd after switching timers, to give it a clean history.)

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb