On Apr 27, 2006, at 5:04 AM, Rhialto wrote:

> I was just trying to cross-build for VAX from my AMD64 machine
> (with -current from yesterday).
>
> It failed when it tried to compile something, since there was no gcc
> built (lots of other cross tools did exist).
>
> It seems this is known, given the message in the middle of the log  
> that
> I now see. But wasn't it the case that the VAX uses an older gcc, so
> that one could be built instead?

The problem is that gcc 2.95 has code generation bugs when compiled on
a LP64 platform.