Subject: Re: something strange with mbuf length...
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>
List: current-users
Date: 04/22/2006 15:28:41
"John R. Shannon" <john@johnrshannon.com> writes:

> Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:13:19 +0100, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Konstantin KABASSANOV" <Konstantin.Kabassanov@lip6.fr> writes:
>>>
>>>> I do use ipfilter.
>>> Since you and Steve both use ipfilter, can this be the problem ?
>>>
>> That's very high on my list of suspects.  I've had the crash when using
>> two different interfaces, ath0 and ppp0.  The ppp0 instance doesn't
>> support v6; in fact, when I fire up ntpd after starting that link, I get
>> bind() fd 12, family 24, port 123, addr fe80::211:25ff:fe43:e8a4,
>> in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=0 fails: Can't assign requested address
>> My filter rules are very simple, too; no NAT, no proxies, just
>> blocking a few ports.
>> 		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
>
>
> My lockups are unrelated. I'm using neither ath0, ppp0 or any packet
> filter. Rate of occurance is several time per day.

But you use INET6 I bet (or at least you have it enabled). Am I wrong ? :-)

-- 
  Rui Paulo			<rpaulo@{NetBSD{,-PT}.org,fnop.net}>