Subject: Re: ath(4) and stealth AP
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 04/19/2006 13:46:43
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:50:37 +0100, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> wrote:

>
> > Is the channel marked for passive scan only?
> 
> I think it was for active scan (if you mean scan_ssid=1), but I'm
> packaging and I already shut down the box..
> 
I can test tonight with an ath interface compiled from yesterday's
source.  I don't know the US regulatory constraints -- what should I
expect to happen?

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb