In article <441DA4EC.1020305@tadpole.com>
garrett_damore@tadpole.com wrote:

> sys/cdefs.h is not guaranteed.  stdio.h *is* guaranteed.

Agreed.

> I don't understand why this change is controversial.

Well, I don't object to including stdio.h instead of sys/cdefs.h,
but maybe we should ask toolchain people on tech-toolchain
or file a PR to punt it to a responsible person.
---
Izumi Tsutsui