Subject: Re: problem with tmpfs and linux emulation?
To: Michael van Elst <mlelstv@serpens.de>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 11/13/2005 08:49:36
In message <dl77sr$k5m$1@serpens.de>, Michael van Elst writes:
>smb@cs.columbia.edu ("Steven M. Bellovin") writes:
>
>>  5172 soffice.bin CALL  getdents64(0x18,0x8188888,0x1000)
>>  5172 soffice.bin RET   getdents64 76/0x4c
>>  5172 soffice.bin CALL  llseek(0x18,0,1,0xbfbfb120,0)
>>  5172 soffice.bin RET   llseek 0
>
>>  6975 soffice.bin CALL  getdents64(0x1a,0x818ebd0,0x4000)
>>  6975 soffice.bin RET   getdents64 76/0x4c
>>  6975 soffice.bin CALL  lstat64(0xb6fe5c18,0xbfbfae70)
>
>Linux readdir() does neither of llseek or lstat64. If it did, then
>you should see the effects also in trivial programs like 'ls'.
>Does /emul/linux/bin/ls fail on tmpfs?
>
It works just fine.  acroread also works.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb