Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
> Rui Paulo wrote:
> 
>> On 2005.10.10 12:58:39 +0300, Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
>> | #   compile  libpam/openpam_get_option.ln
>> | CC=/usr/obj/tools/bin/i386--netbsdelf-gcc | 
>> /usr/obj/tools/bin/i386--netbsdelf-lin
>> | t -chapbxzF -Sw -X 233 -d /usr/obj/usr/src/destdir.i386/usr/include  
>> | -DLIB_MAJ=0
>> |  -DOPENPAM_STATIC_MODULES -DOPENPAM_STATIC_MODULE    -i |  
>> /usr/src/dist/openpam/li
>> | b/openpam_get_option.c
>> | /usr/src/dist/openpam/lib/openpam_get_option.c(68): syntax error [249]
>> | /usr/src/dist/openpam/lib/openpam_get_option.c(71): warning: 
>> function | openpam_ge
>> | t_option falls off bottom without returning value [217]
>>
>> Can you show me these two lines ?
>>
>>         -- Rui Paulo
> 
> 
> Well unless CVS has freaked, they're as they should be in v1.2.
> Here's the whole file excluding the copyright. I checked that
> RETURNS() has been defined in openpam_impl.h.

Well, looking more than 1 second at the file made me want
to delete the whole file and run cvs update :-)

Problem solved. Although now I wonder, what other local files
might be corrupted even that CVS says they're up to date!

A veeryy loooooong minus to CVS!

Teemu

-- 
teemu@rinta-aho.org -+- http://www.rinta-aho.org