Subject: Re: altq api for ipf and pf
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Thomas E. Spanjaard <tgen@netphreax.net>
List: current-users
Date: 09/26/2005 21:39:17
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig05CBE44A39735FBF67878C3F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christos Zoulas wrote:
  > Currently altq can be used without a packet filter. Is it desirable to
> keep that functionality?

That is desirable, for instance for third-party firewalls (tunix?). See 
my other post from a minute ago.

Cheers,
-- 
		-- Thomas E. Spanjaard
		   tgen@netphreax.net

--------------enig05CBE44A39735FBF67878C3F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFDOE5l6xCMwBJ+1+sRAoI4AJ9P1sigB1m+kyDDT3cY7bU8/KfBsQCeLaOt
ciKMByIUyjK/KLGESlCHUdo=
=WYH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig05CBE44A39735FBF67878C3F--