--p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2005.08.24 13:28:30 +0000, John Nemeth wrote:
| On Jan 14, 10:01am, Rui Paulo wrote:
| } On 2005.08.24 16:18:25 +0000, Zafer Aydogan wrote:
| } | I wonder why lib/30923 is still open in 3.99.8
| } | A patch was provided.
| } | This should be pulled up to 2.1, where the same problem is far more e=
xplicit
| } | and tells me that root login is refused for root, when supplied with =
the
| } | correct root passwort.
| }=20
| } 2.1 doesn't have PAM. What about 3.0_BETA ?
|=20
|      PAM went in before the branch, so 3.0 will have it.

I was not asking if 3.0_BETA has PAM, I was asking if it has the problem.

		-- Rui Paulo

--p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDDOMIZPqyxs9FH4QRArxFAKCW9IG5qdIalSm6HFMufDQTZ8poCwCglT7p
2GJgagTpjZ1OzfdqE+CAMVE=
=Pvro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--p4qYPpj5QlsIQJ0K--