Subject: Re: vnconfig is broken
To: None <dlagno@rambler.ru>
From: Chris Ross <cross+netbsd@distal.com>
List: current-users
Date: 05/10/2005 15:18:38
Denis Lagno wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:50:51PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer scribed:
> 
>>Make sure you don't have a file called vnd0 or vnd0d in the current directory.
> 
> bingo!:)
> 
> I'm going to use cgd atop vnd, and vnd0d in the current directory is file with cgd parameters..

   Now to ask the next question.  Is it sensible for vnconfig
to look for a device in the cwd?  Why would one ever *want*
this behavior?

   If you don't have that file in the cwd, does it behave
as I'd expect, iterating any /dev/vnd# devices?

                      - Chris