Subject: Re: experiments with lfs
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubertf@gmx.de>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 04/09/2005 17:22:47
--ck3np9Ek/EMsFxRu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:04:53AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> Wasn't the point of LFS to not require a time-consuming fsck-run?

Sure, fsck -p (which runs at boot) just does a roll-forward, and is
quick.

I wanted to do a full check, to make sure the kernel and fsck agreed
(since there have been arguments between them in the past :) - that
was what was slow.

--
Dan.


--ck3np9Ek/EMsFxRu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCV4LHEAVxvV4N66cRAuruAJ0RDfcrg/F4jstYtCgQKy8dFXJnYACcCY4m
NHrOp+D5POmPdIJJpOJtL9A=
=SILg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ck3np9Ek/EMsFxRu--