Subject: Re: Why not softdep per default?
To: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: current-users
Date: 03/29/2005 22:33:05
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 09:13:13PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> Like i386?
> 
> There is an open issue with mpt(4) where monting disks with softdep (or
> async, in the case of an installation) will jam the machine quickly.

Is it still true ? I made some changes to scsipi to address this some
time ago.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--