Subject: Re: Why not softdep per default?
To: Johnny Billquist <bqt@Update.UU.SE>
From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih@eunetnorge.no>
List: current-users
Date: 03/29/2005 16:57:06
Johnny Billquist <bqt@Update.UU.SE> writes:
> On a VAX, you're lucky if the system lives 10 minutes before it
> crash. And that is still true in -current.
Uh -- my 4000-500 has been running with softdeps on all file systems
for a couple of weeks now, spending most of that time churning through
software builds, with lots of disk I/O. Not a glitch to be seen. :-)
It's running -current as of a couple of weeks ago.
-tih
--
Don't ascribe to stupidity what can be adequately explained by ignorance.