Subject: Re: PAM enabled on head
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
From: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
List: current-users
Date: 03/13/2005 14:12:50
At 20:09 Uhr -0500 12.3.2005, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>On Mar 12, 11:58pm, hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE (Hauke Fath) wrote:
>-- Subject: Re: PAM enabled on head
>
>| I won't pretend I understand the pam magic you've worked - anyway, it fixed
>| the problem. Thanks!
>
>No thank you for helping to track this down. Finding out that it core-dumps
>was a big hint...

I saw the "kern.logsigexit=1" zipping by on a mailing-list and thought it
might be useful. And when I looked at the rshd pam module source I saw
there was no legal exit()...

>| None of my non-pam machines ever did that. Could it be related to 'su'
>| prompting for a password twice on some machines (not happening here,
>| though)?
>
>No, just another stupid bug.

Yep, all working nicely now.

	hauke


--
/~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ /    No HTML/RTF in email
 X     No Word docs in email
/ \  Respect for open standards