Subject: Re: mono experience cutting to subversion
To: Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: current-users
Date: 02/11/2005 12:58:08
--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Herb Peyerl wrote:
>=20
> On 11-Feb-05, at 1:33 PM, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> >>I rarely run 'cvs annotate' myself.
> >Oh, subversion doesn't have an annotate command? That really knocks it
> >down in my book. While I may not need the annotate command often, when=
=20
> >I
> >need it, I really really need it. So I guess we'll wait for the=20
> >subversion
> >folks to add it. :-)
>=20
> It has 'svn blame' which is equivalent but they recently fixed it to be=
=20
> only 10x slower instead of the previous 100x slower than 'cvs=20
> annotate'.

Ok. That will do. While slower isn't as desirable, it doesn't happen that=
=20
much and 10x (with the hope of future improvements :-) will be fine.

Take care,

Bill

--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCDRxgWz+3JHUci9cRAuH/AJ9ihyKHfFE2qXBub9khYvGxX/XObACfWoUS
4UP/z0gfaGrGYrBIeVOhLmY=
=NpeA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo--