--Signature=_Sun__18_Jul_2004_13_39_42_+0300_I_xqJ5r._O0./h.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 00:57:45 +0100 Ove Soerensen <ove@elektro-eel.org>
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 06:56:36PM +0300, Staffan Thomen wrote:
> > I'm wondering about us with the "non-enhanced" speedstep, there
> > seems not to be any support for it? I understand this is a
> > user-settable setting, linux and windows have some software for it,
> > but not us...
> 
> The "classic" SpeedStep is not quite as straightforward as Enhanced
> SpeedStep. IIRC you need to suspend the cpu before switching frequency
> which takes ages speaking in GHz-terms and makes the approach estd
> takes (involving multiple frequency-switches in a short interval)
> unfeasible. Additionaly you have to cope with buggy ACPI
> implementations or go for semi-official mainboard specific interfaces.
> This would be some tough work and require access to a lot of different
> laptop-models to get it working reliably.

I see, thanks anyway.

-- 
Staffan Thomen
1024D/7C7E2EF8

--Signature=_Sun__18_Jul_2004_13_39_42_+0300_I_xqJ5r._O0./h.0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (IRIX64)

iD8DBQFA+lNxEbvWbnx+LvgRAtQOAJ4uTbWEXDc9qjNQGJEGTf8IVgEpdwCfTl8/
xx/qtLB2uXm5VXTDVTcE1VE=
=C9jq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__18_Jul_2004_13_39_42_+0300_I_xqJ5r._O0./h.0--