Subject: Re: uscanner* and 2.0
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.de>
List: current-users
Date: 03/29/2004 06:53:31
In article <20040329045131.GA12097@bjan.freeshell.org>,
	"Bruce J.A. Nourish" <bjan@bjan.freeshell.org> writes:
> The new approach on both Linux and the BSDs is simply to use 
> ugen(4) to directly control the scanner. 

Does that really work under NetBSD? When I bought my Epson Perfection 1260
a year ago uscanner(4) was the only way to get it working with SANE at that
point of time.

> I ask that, at the least, we comment out uscanner in the GENERIC
> kernels, and perhaps remove it altogether.

If it is *known* to work in all configuration which worked with uscanner(4)
before we can remove it.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://scheler.de/~matthias/