Subject: Re: Spam suggestion...
To: Wolfgang S. Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus20040222T122544@dailyplanet.dontspam.wsrcc.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 02/23/2004 18:21:26
--dJyWBSYfjLochwFK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:40:19PM -0800, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>=20
> kre@munnari.OZ.AU (Robert Elz) writes:
> > ps: I'm not exactly sure what all the fuss is about - the amount of spa=
m that
> > either comes through, or pretends to come through, netbsd lists, is
> > still negligible.
>=20
> Agreed.  Spam on this and the other lists is essentially non-existent.

One very important reason for this is that we have hardworking
mailing-list admins who manually review a bunch of stuff that hits the
filters.  It's an abhorrent task, and I'm for anything that reduces
this workload through automation.

--
Dan.

--dJyWBSYfjLochwFK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAOan2EAVxvV4N66cRAuYBAJ4qUiMPD8ZhRuH1mc1xUFEp+ub49gCfRR7g
MYczFD08uW/axe4hyG+CvFE=
=mSK1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dJyWBSYfjLochwFK--