--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:37:08AM -0800, David P. Reese Jr. wrote:
> I'm curious if you can determine if a frame buffer is running in greyscale
> versus color by giving an ioctl on /dev/ttyE0.  My scenario involves a
> mac68k with internal video.  Using the WSDISPLAYIO_GINFO ioctl I can
> determine the bit depth of the frame buffer, but I don't know if it's
> running in greyscale.
>=20
> Should this be determined using the WSDISPLAYIO_GTYPE ioctl and having it
> return a different display type for greyscale versus color?

I don't think so. While the difference is quite clear to end users, from=20
the point of view of the graphics system, they are the same. The only=20
difference is that the color pallete is rather restricted. So for indirect=
=20
color setups (256 and fewer colors) it makes sense to use a pallete that=20
has shades of grey, not different colors.

It strikes me that greyscale is more of a behavior. You definitely want it
if the monitor is greyscale, but you can use it even if you have a "color"=
=20
monitor. So I'd think it's more an attribute of the monitor, not a=20
different type.

Take care,

Bill

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/+1bZWz+3JHUci9cRAlOmAJ4ygw1YWYgkGsPA3x/46tbhrhi/MgCfZSfV
BGrQ1VE6uHcLBOHOOkUcWaQ=
=KKLH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--