Subject: Re: recent 1-6 branch libc and mozilla (etc.)
To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: current-users
Date: 10/11/2003 19:21:36
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 12:04:47AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>     Date:        Thu, 9 Oct 2003 22:10:18 +0200
>     From:        Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
>     Message-ID:  <20031009201018.GA1098@antioche.eu.org>
> 
>   | What do the RFCs says for this ?
>   | if dnscache is OK, we'll have to fix libc.
> 
> I know that this has been fixed (in -current anyway, not in 1.6 yet
> I believe) but no-one actually answered this, so ...
> 
> "OK" is not the right thing to ask.   What dnscache is doing is legal,
> there's no requirement to send anything in the auth or additional sections
> when sending an answer.
> 
> "OK" implies more of a value judgement, for which the answer is less clear.

Well, I meant "legal" :)

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--