> In message <20031009211942.489A22ECA@decoy.but-b.or.jp>
> 	so spake enami tsugutomo (enami):
> 
> > btw, what is wrong with cp == eom?
> 
> In the cases I investifated, eom pointed to the byte *after* the
> end of the buffer, not the last byte of the buffer.  E.g, it was
> set to buf + sizeof(buf).  Now, it is entirely possible that it is
> set inconsistently in the resolver code.  It's a fairly tangled web
> to unravel...

But it is normal end condition.  Where the *cp is accessed in the case
exactly?

enami.