Lars Heidieker wrote:
> should have the FXPF_HAS_RESUME_BUG removed as this breaks at least the 
> case PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_PRO_100_VM_6 interface if it is a 82562EZ
> if there is any chip that needs the pacth this case should be broken 
> into two.

Does the chip work with both things (sc_rev = 1 and FXPF_HAS_RESUME_BUG)
removed, or is the sc_rev = 1 part still needed for VM_6 ?

Jaromir 
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.cz/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric    -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow.   Do not let this distract you.''     -=-