Subject: Re: libpthread
To: Sean Davis <dive@endersgame.net>
From: Charlie Allom <charlie@rubberduck.com>
List: current-users
Date: 06/20/2003 16:23:12
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 06:08:59AM +0000, Sean Davis wrote:
> current state of affairs (especially on SMP machines, from what I read on
> the lists) counts as stable by any definition of the word.
> 

This is the same argument as the UFS2 checkin.

-current is for bleeding edge. The SMP code hasn't been fiddled with
much because the nature of the NetBSD project doesn't assign anyone to
tasks they must do..

I am hurting because I put -current on my production boxes. It is not
stable. I've not got anyone to blame but myself though :)

  C.
-- 
 charlie@rubberduck.com - Melbourne, Australia
 http://rubberduck.com/~yeled/
 PGP: 0x14AA7941 || finger yeled@lazy.spodder.com