In article <20030318113219.Q722@snowdrop.l8s.co.uk> you write:
>> This kind of thing is precisely why I think NetBSD should be ignoring XSI.
>
>I guess the XSI stuff is worth implementing if it doesn't break
>existing behaviour.

Yeah, maybe "ignoring" is too strong a word.  I think NetBSD should treat
XSI as just another Unix variant to copy features from, but not as a
standard to try to conform to in its entirity.

-- 
Ben Harris                                                   <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/acorn26           <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/acorn26/>