Thus spake Chuck Yerkes ("CY> ") sometime Today...

CY> > Correct.  The whole JFS4BSD effort was more an experiment than
CY> > anything serious.  It's not clear why anybody would want it, either.
CY>
CY> It would be nice to have alternatives, just for the sake of.
CY> All in all, I'd rather have efforts go to UFS2, but it would
CY> be awefully nice to be able to read and write some linux
CY> FS that wasn't ext2.  (or get linux to speak UFS - I want my
CY> mp3's available no matter what OS I boot into on my dev machine:)

Can we R/W ext2fs?  That would be _a_ solution, though obviously not
the correct one.. :)

I have a similar problem, which is why I use FS_MSDOS to read my mp3s.
[I boot to something that is worse than Lunix on occasion...]

I wonder if I should just migrate my mp3s to my server and go NFS, but
it's so much nicer not to load the network for this.

				--*greywolf;
--
NetBSD: You can't handle it.