Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >> Sure sounds like a religious argument to me.
> >
> >What's so religious about this? If I don't want to use the PAM library,
> >I don't want my software to be linked against it.
> 
> "Religious" in this sense means, "Having nothing to do with reason".
> (E.g., I have yet to see a coherent reason why having PAM in the OS
> could ever harm you, unless you went out of your way to hose it up).
> 
> --Ken

Reread the above sentence again. If it doesn't make a logical sense to
you, I can't help you.