On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Dan Melomedman wrote:

> Because there are better frameworks than PAM, like BSD Auth, and because
> very few people would need such rarity as AFS authentication. I think
> most sysadmins would benefit from simplicity of BSD Auth. In other
> words, have BSD Auth additional to PAM, but not have it sit on top of
> it. Or have PAM sit on top of BSD Auth, and hack your rare features
> outside of it.

PAM on top of BSD Auth isn't really PAM, and so it's not really
interesting.

What's wrong with BSD Auth on top of PAM? If you want to do BSD Auth,
there it is.

I would envision that when all is said & done, that we'd ship with both
PAM and a BSD Auth infrastructure. So an admin can pich whichever one s/he
wants to do.

Take care,

Bill